With globalisation the convergence of media is inevitable
for several reasons. Firstly because of
the ease of communication media is not only local and national but also
global. While people are interested in
the local man who got put in jail they are also interested in the fact that
there have been shootings in America. If
this is the case why is it when you turn on the news, read a magazine or even
listen to the radio that all of the stories are the same? Is it purely the fact that 5 major companies
hold an oligopoly over global media? (Jenkins, 2004)
Yes there has been a convergence of global media; we are all
up in each other’s business wanting to know what’s going on. But it comes down to the individual; their
preferences, background and needs as to which information they seek out. This is what the internet has allowed us to
do, seek out the information we need. So
yes while there has been a major convergence of global media through large
transnational companies, the internet is the primary reason for this. It has allowed these companies to publish all of their breaking news and content online but has also allowed for a very
individualistic approach through youtube, social media and blogging. (Jenkins 2004)
Reference List:
Jenkins, H., 2004, 'The Cultural Logic of Media Convergence', International Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 7, Iss. 13.
Certainly a well written post here. Although other people may not like it, I love your use of "all up in your business" great phrase that gives the blog a casual feel while still maintaining quality information about the topic at hand. Personally I really like your point about the Oliogopoly being a potential reason why when you turn on the news that all of the stories are the same. It's very interesting that now with the increasing popularity on the internet for news that the most viewed or commented on stories may soon become what makes the 30 minute block of news at night.
ReplyDeletethis is a very informative piece that makes the reader think. you raise some good points and it's good you have included a reference
ReplyDelete